Publications
>
Article

The Flipped classroom in the learning of korfball in fifth and sixth grade

Publicated to:Aloma. Revista De Psicologia I Ciènces De L'educació. 37 (2): 43-52 - 2019-11-11 37(2), DOI: 10.51698/aloma.2019.37.2.43-52

Authors: Marques-Molias, Luis; Palau-Martin, Ramon; Usart, Mireia; Morilla, Francesc

Affiliations

Escola Jacint Verdaguer Castelldefels, Castelldefels, Spain - Author
Univ Rovira & Virgili, Tarragona, Spain - Author

Abstract

The Flipped classroom (FC) model has come into widespread use in recent years. However, there are few studies showing the improvement of academic results with the implementation of this model, particularly in the field of Physical Education and, even more specifically, in Primary Education. The main goal of this research, which is focused on the third cycle of Primary Education (fifth and sixth grades), is to compare the results of a didactic proposal for the teaching of Korfball via an FC model with those of another group (control). Data were collected with three instruments and at three points in the academic term. Results show significant differences in Korfball performance and, more specifically, in the rules and the application of game strategy during game play, when students with FC scored higher. In terms of gender, Korfball seems to minimize the differences in the results of assessment between boys and girls. This study could be useful for teachers wishing to implement new proposals in the Physical Education classroom and, additionally, for researchers interested in studying of the benefits of FC and the application of Korfball in Primary Education.

Keywords
Flipped classroomGenderHigher-educationInnovation in educationKorfballModelPhysical educationPrimary educationStudents

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Aloma. Revista De Psicologia I Ciènces De L'educació, Q4 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Computer Networks and Communications, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.96, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-15, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 10
  • Google Scholar: 9
  • OpenCitations: 4
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-15:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 64 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Marqués Molías, Luis) .