{rfName}
Tw

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Muñoz Abellana, BegoñaAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome

Publicated to:International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 96 (2): 98-102 - 2007-01-01 96(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.002

Authors: Acosta-Rojas R, Becker J, Munoz-Abellana B, Ruiz C, Carreras E, Gratacos E, Catalunya and Balears Monochorionic Network

Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of chorionicity on the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTS) or selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR). Method: Pregnancies with 127 monochorionic (MC) and 109 dichorionic (DC) twins were followed up, and TTS and sIUGR incidence as well as morbidity and mortality were evaluated. Results: The incidence of intrauterine fetal death was higher in MC than in DC pregnancies (6.5% vs. 1%), and higher in MC pregnancies complicated by TTS (5 deaths in 10 pregnancies [50%]) or sIUGR (2 in 9 [22%]). The incidence of sIUGR was similar in MC and DC pregnancies (7% vs. 5%), and the incidence of TTS was 8% in MC pregnancies (95% confidence interval, 3.2-12.8). Neonatal neurological and respiratory morbidity was higher among MC twins, and the increase in neonatal complications was linked to TTS and sIUGR. Uncomplicated MC and DC pregnancies had similar perinatal outcomes. Conclusion: The incidence of neonatal complications was higher in MC twins born of pregnancies complicated by TTS or sIUGR. Although the incidence of sIUGR was similar in MC and DC pregnancies, there was a trend towards worse outcomes in MC pregnancies affected by sIUGR. © 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Keywords

IncidenceMonochorionic twinsSelective intrauterine growth restrictionTwin pregnancyTwin-twin transfusion syndrome

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2007, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Medicine (Miscellaneous). Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q3 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Obstetrics & Gynecology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 32.41, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-04, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 146
  • Scopus: 176
  • Europe PMC: 94
  • OpenCitations: 175

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-04:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 111 (PlumX).