{rfName}
Lo

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Cabre Vila, Juan JoseAuthorMartín Lujan, Francisco ManuelAuthorMoragas Moreno AAuthorBasora JAuthor

Share

May 6, 2021
Publications
>
Review
No

Long Covid-19: Proposed Primary Care Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Disease Management

Publicated to:International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health. 18 (8): 4350- - 2021-04-02 18(8), DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084350

Authors: Siso-Almirall, Antoni; Brito-Zeron, Pilar; Conangla Ferrin, Laura; Kostov, Belchin; Moragas Moreno, Anna; Mestres, Jordi; Sellares, Jaume; Galindo, Gisela; Morera, Ramon; Basora, Josep; Trilla, Antoni; Ramos-Casals, Manuel

Affiliations

Board Spanish Soc Managers Primary Care SEDAP, Madrid 28026, Spain - Author
Catalan Soc Family & Community Med CAMFiC, Permanent Board, Barcelona 08009, Spain - Author
Coll Catalan Phys, Barcelona 08017, Spain - Author
Consorci Atencio Primaria Salut Barcelona Esquerr, Primary Care Ctr Corts, Barcelona 08028, Spain - Author
Hosp CIMA Sanitas, Dept Med, Autoimmune Dis Unit, Barcelona 08034, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Autoimmune Dis, ICMiD, Barcelona 08036, Spain - Author
IDIAP Jordi Gol, Barcelona 08007, Spain - Author
IDIBAPS CELLEX, Lab Autoimmune Dis Josep Font, Barcelona 08036, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAPS, Primary Healthcare Transversal Res Grp, Barcelona 08036, Spain - Author
Spanish Soc Family & Community Med semFYC, Permanent Board, Barcelona 08009, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Barcelona 08036, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Catalunya UPC, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Barcelona 08034, Spain - Author
Univ Rovira & Virgili, Inst Catala Salut, Jaume Hlth Ctr 1, Tarragona 43005, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Long COVID-19 may be defined as patients who, four weeks after the diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 infection, continue to have signs and symptoms not explainable by other causes. The estimated frequency is around 10% and signs and symptoms may last for months. The main long-term manifestations observed in other coronaviruses (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)) are very similar to and have clear clinical parallels with SARS-CoV-2: mainly respiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuropsychiatric. The growing number of patients worldwide will have an impact on health systems. Therefore, the main objective of these clinical practice guidelines is to identify patients with signs and symptoms of long COVID-19 in primary care through a protocolized diagnostic process that studies possible etiologies and establishes an accurate differential diagnosis. The guidelines have been developed pragmatically by compiling the few studies published so far on long COVID-19, editorials and expert opinions, press releases, and the authors' clinical experience. Patients with long COVID-19 should be managed using structured primary care visits based on the time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on the current limited evidence, disease management of long COVID-19 signs and symptoms will require a holistic, longitudinal follow up in primary care, multidisciplinary rehabilitation services, and the empowerment of affected patient groups.

Keywords

AnosmiaArthralgiaCoronavirus disease 2019CoughingCovid-19Differential diagnosisDisease durationDisease managementDysgeusiaDyspneaEmotional well-beingEmpowermentEvidence based medicineEvidence based practiceFatigueFollow upGastrointestinal symptomGuidelineHeadacheHealth impactHealth policyHeart diseaseHolistic careHumanHumansImmunopathologyInfectious diseaseLaboratory testLong covid-19Lung diseaseManagement practiceMental healthMultidisciplinary teamMyalgiaPatient carePatient care planningPhysical examinationPractice guidelinePrimary carePrimary health careRehabilitation careReviewSars coronavirusSars-cov-2Severe acute respiratory syndromeSymptomatologyThorax painThrombosis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 10.32. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 6.67 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 58.32 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-03, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 124
  • Scopus: 148
  • Europe PMC: 48

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-03:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 459.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 459 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 545.4.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 488 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 35 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is: